<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
<title>Remi Olsen.</title> 
<link>http://www.remiolsen.info/</link> 
<description>A Blog</description> 
<generator>Warka Dang 1.1</generator> 
<language>en</language> 
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
<item>
<title>Arial vs Helvetica, or why I will defend Arial until I'm bored doing so</title>
<link>http://www.remiolsen.info/2012/03/16/arial-vs-helveticaor-why-i-will-defend-arial-until-i-m-bored-doing-so</link>
<guid>http://www.remiolsen.info/2012/03/16/arial-vs-helveticaor-why-i-will-defend-arial-until-i-m-bored-doing-so</guid>
<comments>http://www.remiolsen.info/2012/03/16/arial-vs-helveticaor-why-i-will-defend-arial-until-i-m-bored-doing-so/#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:03:00 PST</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[If you in any sense enjoy typography you already know you have to love Helvetica and hate Arial. Hey, it's the law, I didn't come up with it.
Except... I don't buy it. Not entirely.
The common reasoning is that Microsoft ripped off Helvetica&nbsp;by producing a sub-standard version of it with Arial, but pretty much every part of that argument is patently false. It takes minimal research to learn&nbsp;Arial&nbsp;was a product of Monotype, not Microsoft. And to say it's a rip-off of Helvetica, well,&nbsp;Helvetica&nbsp;is a rip-off of&nbsp;Akzidenz-Grotesk&nbsp;(and earlier fonts) should we follow that logic, but I don't see too many people raise that argument. (Watch Helvetica for more on the font's history, it's streaming on Netflix.)
The differences between the two fonts can be hard to spot, even if you work regularly&nbsp;with them. The capital "G" and "R" are the giveaways, and "Q", "r", &nbsp;and "a" are helpful too. General differences in stroke cuts and glyphs can be spotted if you look closely.

But for the most part? We're talking more similarities than differences.
I do think Helvetica&nbsp;in and of itself is a nicer looking font, but am starting to tire of all the typography-snobs being so down on Arial. They're nearly identical. They're both inspired by older typefaces. It's not the end of the world should a website out there dare to use Arial.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you in any sense enjoy typography you already know you have to love <em>Helvetica</em> and hate <em>Arial</em>. Hey, it's the law, I didn't come up with it.</p>
<p>Except... I don't buy it. Not entirely.</p>
<p>The common reasoning is that Microsoft ripped off <em>Helvetica</em>&nbsp;by producing a sub-standard version of it with <em>Arial</em>, but pretty much every part of that argument is patently false. It takes minimal research to learn&nbsp;<em>Arial</em>&nbsp;was a product of Monotype, not Microsoft. And to say it's a rip-off of <em>Helvetica</em>, well,&nbsp;<em>Helvetica</em>&nbsp;is a rip-off of&nbsp;<em>Akzidenz-Grotesk</em>&nbsp;(and earlier fonts) should we follow that logic, but I don't see too many people raise that argument. (Watch <em>Helvetica </em>for more on the font's history, it's streaming on Netflix.)</p>
<p>The differences between the two fonts can be hard to spot, even if you work regularly&nbsp;with them. The capital "G" and "R" are the giveaways<em>, </em>and "Q", "r", &nbsp;and "a" are helpful too. General differences in stroke cuts and glyphs can be spotted if you look closely.</p>
<p class="figure"><img src="http://remiolsen.info/images/avh.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>But for the most part? We're talking more similarities than differences.</p>
<p>I do think <em>Helvetica</em>&nbsp;in and of itself is a nicer looking font, but am starting to tire of all the typography-snobs being so down on <em>Arial</em>. They're nearly identical. They're both inspired by older typefaces. It's not the end of the world should a website out there dare to use <em>Arial.</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sebastien Tellier's Divine</title>
<link>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/11/22/sebastien-tellier-divine</link>
<guid>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/11/22/sebastien-tellier-divine</guid>
<comments>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/11/22/sebastien-tellier-divine/#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:37:00 PST</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[I've been on a Sebastien Tellier kick over the past six months or so. Because, really, why not? The man recorded the best Eurovision entry ever&nbsp;after all! (And if you've watched Eurovision, you know that says... Well, it says absolutely nothing, but that's neither here nor there.)









That's his "Divine". I dare you not to hum along to it.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been on a Sebastien Tellier kick over the past six months or so. Because, really, why not? The man recorded the best Eurovision entry <em>ever</em>&nbsp;after all! (And if you've watched Eurovision, you know that says... Well, it says absolutely nothing, but that's neither here nor there.)</p>
<p class="video">
<object width="420" height="315" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/Vz58Hw9hldw?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash">
<param name="data" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Vz58Hw9hldw?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Vz58Hw9hldw?version=3&amp;hl=en_US" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
</object>
</p>
<p>That's his "Divine". I dare you not to hum along to it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>My favorite Jony Ive design</title>
<link>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/11/03/my-favorite-jony-ive-design</link>
<guid>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/11/03/my-favorite-jony-ive-design</guid>
<comments>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/11/03/my-favorite-jony-ive-design/#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:29:00 PST</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Oh, there are many to choose from, and the iPhone 4S and the MacBook Air are both&nbsp;exceptionally well designed.
Yet the simplicity of the current Apple Remote Control is pretty awesome and you don't even have to look at it to use it.&nbsp;The directional and "Play/Pause" buttons curve out, the "OK" and "Menu" buttons in.&nbsp;
The feel in the hand is sturdy, too.
Really, sometimes it's the little things, and the Apple Remote is awesome in all its simplicity.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, there are many to choose from, and the iPhone 4S and the MacBook Air are both&nbsp;exceptionally well designed.</p>
<p>Yet the simplicity of the current Apple Remote Control is pretty awesome and you don't even have to look at it to use it.&nbsp;The directional and "Play/Pause" buttons curve out, the "OK" and "Menu" buttons in.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The feel in the hand is sturdy, too.</p>
<p>Really, sometimes it's the little things, and the Apple Remote is awesome in all its simplicity.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>American Horror Story</title>
<link>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/10/07/american-horror-story</link>
<guid>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/10/07/american-horror-story</guid>
<comments>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/10/07/american-horror-story/#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 12:44:00 PST</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[What has&nbsp;Dylan McDermott been doing since The Practice? A lot of push-ups, apparently, and I can only assume he has a clause in his American Horror Story&nbsp;contract stipulating that he can show his body off every ten minute or so.
The actual show, meanwhile, is promising, particularly with its obvious homage to&nbsp;Fulci's 1981 classic, The House by the Cemetery.
Good acting, great filming, a couple of scares, and a decent amount of surrealism which I hope they won't try to over-explain in future episodes... Yes, definitely a promising show.









(Still curious&nbsp;why Ryan Murphy casts so many actors with Down Syndrome in his shows.)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has&nbsp;Dylan McDermott been doing since <em>The Practice</em>? A lot of push-ups, apparently, and I can only assume he has a clause in his <em>American Horror Story</em>&nbsp;contract stipulating that he can show his body off every ten minute or so.</p>
<p>The actual show, meanwhile, is promising, particularly with its obvious homage to&nbsp;Fulci's 1981 classic, <em>The House by the Cemetery</em>.</p>
<p>Good acting, great filming, a couple of scares, and a decent amount of surrealism which I hope they won't try to over-explain in future episodes... Yes, definitely a promising show.</p>
<p class="video">
<object width="329" height="167" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/JOugYXSfNow?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash">
<param name="data" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JOugYXSfNow?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JOugYXSfNow?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
</object>
</p>
<p>(Still curious&nbsp;why Ryan Murphy casts so many actors with Down Syndrome in his shows.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dieter Rams: Ten Principles for Good Design</title>
<link>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/10/06/dieter-rams-ten-principles-for-good-design</link>
<guid>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/10/06/dieter-rams-ten-principles-for-good-design</guid>
<comments>http://www.remiolsen.info/2011/10/06/dieter-rams-ten-principles-for-good-design/#comments</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:04:00 PST</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[
Good design is innovative
Good design makes a product useful
Good design is aesthetic
Good design makes a product understandable
Good design is unobtrusive
Good design is honest
Good design is long-lasting
Good design is thorough, down to the last detail
Good design is environmentally friendly
Good design is as little design as possible
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>Good design is innovative</li>
<li>Good design makes a product useful</li>
<li>Good design is aesthetic</li>
<li>Good design makes a product understandable</li>
<li>Good design is unobtrusive</li>
<li>Good design is honest</li>
<li>Good design is long-lasting</li>
<li>Good design is thorough, down to the last detail</li>
<li>Good design is environmentally friendly</li>
<li>Good design is as little design as possible</li>
</ol>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel></rss>
